A key reason why Science Based Targets are favoured is they always contain an interim target, not just a distant, “net zero by 2050” proclamation. This is typically committing to a halving of emissions within a decade of the base year, resulting in a decline of about 6% per year (Covid years not withstanding). This matters because due to the scale of historic cumulative emissions we have a limited budget left to avoid the worst climate effects: acting in the near-term matters most.
From October this year, the number of companies seeking or receiving validation is around 9,000 and these figures are updated weekly on the SBTi website. The extraordinary demand for corporate decarbonisation standards and target validation services has prompted a major scale-up in operations.
The SBTi is now a UK charity (no. 1205768), which aims to enable ‘companies and financial institutions worldwide to play their part in combatting the climate crisis.’ The charity has benefited from two $18 million donations, one from the IKEA Foundation and the other from the Bezos Earth Fund, that should help improve guidance on specific standards in six high-impact areas, including apparel, automotives, and oil and gas.
It has already created sector specific guidance for some of the most carbon intensive segments of the global economy. This matters because there are seismic differences in carbon intensity between sectors: a cement or utility company may generate Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions that are thousands of times that of an insurance company using the equivalent measure (tonnes per million dollars of revenue).